michelle, i had to do some photo-retouching on some of the pics. see if you noticed any or not.
Wed 26-Apr-2006 11:28 Posted by:unnamed
Hi,
Curious about something.
What do you think of the 28-200. I was thinking about getting the elusive 18-200 but 28-200 is such a cheaper alternative.
Thanks.
in my honest opinion, the 28-200 lens is ok for a newbie. Someone who's not really too sure about apertures and lag in focusing time. however, after using it for a while now, I'd rather have a fast lens that can perform well under low light situations. my advise, and wish list, is to have 2 lens to cover that range (17-55 2.8 and 70-200 2. for me that will be more than sufficient for me.
for me that will be more than sufficient for me. 
